Gender theories are a group of perspectives that
specifically target gender as an important variable in understanding crime.
These perspectives are meant to sensitize scholars to the “invisibility” of women
in the field. The author suggests that this could be largely based the view of
a patriarchal society which empowers males in all fundamentally social
interactions. This view essentially states that females are subordinate and
males are dominant. Feminist criminology is in part focused on critiquing these
traditionally male-based views on understanding crime.
A paternalistic society, also referred to as paternalism, is
organized around independence for males with dependency for females.
Paternalism also suggest that women need to be protected, for their own good,
since the patriarchal power relations in our social system explain why women
are more likely to be victimized by friends or intimates within her home,
rather than by a stranger or away from home. This patriarchal power is one of
the central elements to the way crime is defined and studied. While the idea of
protecting women does not sound to be disadvantageous to women, in the case of Turner v. Safley it is evident that the “protection”
given to the females is discriminatory. The U.S. Supreme Court criticized the
Missouri Department of Corrections for routinely approving the male inmate’s
marriage requests, but only allowing female inmate marriage requests when the
situation involves the presence of a child born out of wedlock. In this case, the
paternalistic policies were unconstitutional in addition to being
discriminatory against females. Paternalism has been argued to be the main
reason most female juveniles are detained more frequently than their male
counterparts.
There are many goals associated with gender theories, and
one is to provide feminist perspectives to criminological knowledge. Most of
the knowledge collected is of “men’s perspective” which can be limited when
discussing topics such as personal conflict, crime, and crime prevention.
The rise of radical feminist criminology is a product of the
emergent radical criminology and a critique of liberal feminism. This feminism
deals with the crime fostered through the creation of the patriarchal and
sexist society within the capitalist and economic society. Sexism defines the
value of women in terms of family, which overall give men control. This control
is used to develop legal concepts that define women as property and
de-emphasize assault on women.
Feminism
As far as criminology is concerned, there is no single
feminist criminological theory. There are five different specialized
perspectives that are discussed in this post: liberal feminism, radical
feminism, Marxist feminism, socialist feminism, and postmodern feminism. The
debate continues on whether to incorporate feminist thought into previous criminological
theories or to start fresh and theorize without any input from previous
theories.
- Liberal Feminism
This is considered the first feminist perspective on gender discrimination
and criminology. The basis for the idea was that females deserved equal
treatment in regards to the criminal justice system. Due to this idea and
belief, gender-based laws and practices were questioned and examined. These
liberal feminists denounced the idea of public/private division, in which
females were to only have power in the domestic or private world. The
presumption was that as females became integrated into the work force, justice
would be evenly dispensed, and there would be a decrease in discrimination.
- Radical Feminism
- Marxist Feminism
Early Marxist theorists never addressed female criminality,
and because of this Marxist feminists view the capitalist system as exploiting
subordinate groups. These groups would often be based on race or gender.
Theorists focused on the division of labor and how females were given lower
value and status labor positions. Polly Radosh has described the sexual
division of labor as “the epitome of economic inequality.” Again, this marginalization
of women’s worth is heavily dependent on males. This feminist theory explains
why women are more frequently arrested for property crimes as well as sexually
oriented offenses.
- Socialist Feminism
The oppression of women, under socialist feminism, is
identified as a symptom of the patriarchal capitalist system. Females are
exploited by this system for their labor and sexuality. Socialist feminism is a
uniting of both the radical and Marxist principles. The female crimes discussed
are usually limited to property crimes. This type of feminism explains that females
are more likely to commit vice crimes and property crimes as opposed to men who
commit violent street crime.
- Postmodern Feminism
As the name suggests, postmodern feminism is the most recent
perspective that shares with non-feminist views when it comes to gender within
the criminological framework. To postmodern feminists, the more pressing issue
is of gender, not crime. The nature of gender in conjunction with crime shifts
when explored along with ethnicity, social status, and age. Prior life experiences
are more factors that could alter the motivations of women’s behavior. When
these experiences are negative such as racism, molestation, or rape, it adds to
the complexity of women’s lives and the meanings of illegality.
This is an interesting article with some very interesting statements made. You have a good writing style. The Turner vs. Safley case reference and how it pertains to the subject is unclear to readers. Also, in regards to the sentence, "Early Marxist theorists never addressed female criminality, and because of this Marxist feminists view the capitalist system as exploiting subordinate groups," I don't see how the first statement leads to the second.
ReplyDeleteThis was very educational. I like how you put headings for each perspective, so it was easy to follow.
ReplyDeleteI love this topic because it seems that these sorts of issues are becoming more prominent once again. It was very informative and organized.
ReplyDelete