Terrorism
and the Media
Osama
Bin Laden after his death; An example of Terrorism in the Media
In
a post 9/11 United States, terrorism becomes increasingly more important as the
media encompasses many fast-paced mediums for reporting terrorism. The media reports are some of the most
important accounts of terrorism that the average American receives on a daily
basis. The media has the power to
portray terrorism and terrorist acts in any light it chooses. Stories have always been passed down through
word of mouth, and each time the story is repeated, it changes slightly. That process develops much faster with modern
mass communication. People on both sides of every issue want their story told,
so they wish to control the media spin.
For that reason, media coverage cannot be neutral, and can be used as a
weapon.
Terrorism
usually involves motives beyond the initial act of vandalism or violence, and
terrorist groups use the media to accomplish their overarching goals. Both terrorists and governments seek to
control the reports so the audience sees them in the most appealing light. Since the definition of terrorism changes
from person to person and group to group, the media plays a major role in
defining terrorism for the targeted audience.
The media’s influence has the potential to be detrimental to society’s
view of terrorism. When phrases such as
“broken borders” and “war on terrorism” are used frequently, society views
terrorism as a large scale war that has defined borders. Terrorism actually does not have borders. Cyber terrorism can affect any group at any
time anywhere in the world.
Although foreign
terrorism steals the spotlight in most media coverage, domestic terrorism might
be a larger threat to security than foreign affairs. In a 39 month study of ABC News, CBS News,
and NBC News, the networks aired 85 stories concerned with homeland security
and 373 stories concerned with the threat of terrorism. The study revealed the preference of
emotional stories that keep viewers’ attention rather than reporting the most
relevant and dangerous terrorism. The
homeland security stories were not even aired until a security breach
occurred. Homeland security affects
daily life in the United States more than the threats of terrorism, and it is
taking the back seat in the reports.
The media in
television has become focused on reporting the story with the most drama to
create the most controversy to entertain viewers. When guests appear on network news casts, the
interview usually becomes an argument between the anchor and the guest. Hosts constantly interrupt guests to answer
their own questions. Since news channels
air 24 hours a day, stories are often replayed giving an illusion of repeated
terrorist attacks. The stories are also
riddled with speculation as to how situations will end. The media wants viewers to watch as much as
they can, so emphasis falls on keeping viewers tuned in rather than the real
issues in each story.
The internet is
the most useful tool for terrorists to broadcast their views to the most
people. They also use the internet to
operate more smoothly and efficiently as a group. Some groups set up secure websites with its
own email server. Then, as long as the
emails stay within the server, the emails are difficult to trace. Terrorists have been known to hack into other
websites. Terrorists also use
steganography. Steganography is the
process of embedding information in a picture, message or other piece of
information. One position on
steganography claims that it enhances terrorist groups’ ability to communicate
and launch cyberattacks. The other position held by Stephan Lau on
steganography claims it is not very dangerous. The real threat is the American
government’s ability to intercept that information without existing
threats.
The author of this material remained mostly objective in reporting about
terrorism and the media. The author
depicts all the different aspects and each aspect’s importance to the overall
safety of targeted populations. When
talking about television, the author did not give many examples of broadcasts in which the anchor argued with a guest.
The author just stated that most interviews end in arguments. There are other topics not discussed in this
analysis, but the author of Terrorism and Homeland Security explains in
detail in chapter four. Overall, the
material was well written and expressed all viewpoints on each topic. The internet seemed to be the most emphasized
topic due to the amount of media coverage on the internet along with the heavy
reliance of terrorist groups on the internet to communicate and broadcast their
messages.
Interesting topic, relevant picture, but the lack of transition sentences in between the paragraphs make it a little hard for the reader to follow. Otherwise, great post.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI had never paid attention to how the media manipulates our views on terrorism, but everything you said makes perfect sense. I would like to see an example of how difference news stations reported the same story on terrorism from different perspectives.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting topic! You brought up a lot of points that I normally wouldn't consider. It's kind of scary to think about what is not being reported!
ReplyDelete